Using a systematic review to develop a taxonomy of uncertainties in health care to structure the design of future participatory research

Session Type
Qualitative synthesis methods
Eachempati P1, Nasser M1
1University of Plymouth, UK

Background: Uncertainty pervades every aspect of the health care system. Identifying the different meanings and conceptual models of uncertainty proposed in health care with a systematic review will allow us to explore the patterns emerging from such models so that we can move further to identify how people interpret and respond to such uncertainties. Objective: The objective of this paper is to showcase how we developed a holistic model of uncertainties that covers different levels of decision-making in healthcare based on findings from a systematic review and how it helped us shape our primary research. Methodology: 4143 articles were otained and screened by two authors. 31 studies were included in the review. Thematic synthesis was done by a clinician, non-clinicaian and a methodology expert to compare the different approaches to the interpretation of data.
Results: Based on themes identified, we developed an overarching model of uncertainty. We illustrated the model at three distinct yet interdependent levels: the macro, meso and microlevel. We involved a few patients informally and sought their views on the developed model. Conclusion: This systematic review was able to deconstruct the separate layers of uncertainty affecting health decisions and allowed us to acknowledge that uncertainty can change and evolve during interactions between different people. We used this framework to design an innovative participatory approach for our project which intends to explore how individuals of different ethnicities and uncertainty tolerance respond to uncertainties in oral health decisions. The approach can be extrapolated and adapted for other similar projects.