Landscape of nutrition or diet-related randomised controlled trials: data from protocols published between 2012 and 2022

Date & Time
Monday, September 4, 2023, 12:30 PM - 2:00 PM
Location Name
Session Type
Moraes F1, Bernardes S1, Durão S2, Schlussel M3
1Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Brazil
2Cochrane Nutrition, South Africa
3University of Oxford, UK

Background: As part of a project to consolidate reporting guidance for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), protocols of RCTs and systematic reviews of nutritional interventions, it was important to understand the nutrition interventions research landscape over the past decade.
Objectives: To assess the nutrition or diet-related interventions research landscape using data from RCT protocols published as research articles between 2012 and 2022.
Methods: We searched six databases for eligible protocols published between January 2012 and March 2022. Data extracted included bibliometrics, study scope (population, intervention, comparator, outcome and study design) and research transparency practices (protocol registration, conflicts of interest and funding statements, and mention of reporting guidelines). We screened the ‘Instructions for Authors’ webpages of each journal contributing publications to our sample to check whether they endorsed reporting guidelines.
Results: We included 1,068 protocols. The frequency of publication of RCT protocols as research articles increased annually, with a mean of 161 (range: 155 to 163) publications per year. Healthy adults (n=342; 32.0%) and older individuals (n=350; 32.7%) made up the most frequent target population. Isolated nutrition or diet-related interventions (n=724; 67.8%) were most frequently studied, with supplementation (n=405; 37.9%) being the most common type of intervention. The most frequent primary outcome reported was clinical status (n=308; 28.8%). Most protocols described a single-centre (n=838; 78.5%), two-arm (n=844; 79.1%), parallel (n=1,014; 94.9%) RCT. Of the 148 journals in which the included protocols were published, general medical journals (n=518; 48.5%) contributed more publications than methods journals (n=479; 44.9%), and nutrition journals (n=71; 6.6%). The SPIRIT statement was endorsed by 33.8% (n=50) of the journals, CONSORT by 75.3% (n=111) and TIDieR by 2.7% (n=4). In 32.1%, 27.8% and 1.9% of publications, the authors mentioned SPIRIT, CONSORT and TIDieR, respectively. Most protocols (n=1,006; 94.2%) reported the study registration and included conflicts of interest (n=952; 89.1%) or funding (n=994; 93.2%) statements.
Conclusions: The number of nutrition or diet-related RCT protocols being published as research articles is increasing over time, showing the importance of this type of publication. The adoption of research transparency practices by researchers and journals can still improve.
Patient, public and/or healthcare consumer involvement: No direct involvement.