Poster session 3
Date & Time
Wednesday, September 6, 2023, 12:30 PM - 2:00 PM
Location Name
Pickwick
Session Type
Poster session
Description
During this session the following posters will be presented:
- : Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach to report the conclusions in a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.
- A critical historical review shows mismatch between available evidence and related international guidelines recommendations: the case of advanced oesophageal cancer
- A new online course on Campbell Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Methods
- A new taxonomy is proposed for defining the interests of stakeholders’ representatives in health research
- A passing grade? How risk communication strategies aligned with citizen's efforts to access health information during COVID-19: A rapid review
- A repository of Cochrane nutrition systematic reviews: providing a nutrition lens on the Cochrane Library
- A test to assess claims about treatment effects for Spanish primary school children: the development and validation of the interactive CLAIM Test
- Adapting evidence-based peri-discharge complex interventions for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions among Heart Failure and COPD patients in Hong Kong
- Adequacy of information on funding and financial conflicts of interest in clinical trial publications and how to obtain missing information: methodological study
- Adherence and quality of systematic reviews for automatically registered protocols: a PROSPERO register study
- Adherence of Cochrane reviews and protocols to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
- Assessing the quality and completeness of health system guidelines and recommendations for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool
- At the beginning of a public health emergency what’s the utility of a conducting a systematic review?
- Attribution of credit in updated Cochrane reviews
- Building a research team: A Cochrane US Network experience focusing on racial health equity
- Challenges in designing and delivering prognostic factor systematic reviews: experience from three reviews
- CHARMS and PROBAST at your fingertips: a template for data extraction and risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews of predictive models
- Citations of Cochrane nutrition reviews in guidelines: appraising the “payback” on investment in nutrition evidence synthesis
- Clinical trials publication rate in Spain: how far have we come?
- Co-producing with children and young people on a meta-ethnography on experiences of chronic pain, treatments and services
- Cochrane EPOC’s template for Qualitative Evidence Syntheses
- Cochrane reviews and evidence certainty for neglected tropical diseases
- Cochrane Russia for trusted evidence: moving forward through the years in numbers
- Cochrane simplified Chinese translation and dissemination: a collaborative model of knowledge translation
- Cochrane South Africa training – does it work to increase knowledge and skills in evidence-based healthcare?
- Collaborating on the COVID-NMA initiative – working on a living mapping and living systematic review in a team effort
- Competency profiles for Evidence-Informed Policy (EIPM): a rapid review
- Concept for teaching medical students evidence-based and Cochrane methods
- Conflicts Of Interest and Risk of Bias In Systematic Reviews On Interventions For 6 Common Diagnoses in Primary Care
- Consistency of protocol and safety data reporting in clinical trial registrations and corresponding publications of interventions involving 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)
- Creating accessible patient guidelines based on oncological evidence-based clinical practice guidelines
- Decision makers find it difficult to compare and select similar systematic reviews based on quality, methods and results: a cross-sectional survey
- Developing an Evidence-based Questionnaire and Evaluating Health Information Literacy for Chinese Residents
- Developing and piloting an adaptation of AMSTAR tool for systematic reviews of research priority setting exercises
- Development and validation of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) model for assessing Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) competency
- Development of a living registry of all randomised controlled trials in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
- Difference between scoping reviews and mapping reviews in the evidence ecosystem
- Differences in search strategies and output between Cochrane Reviews and matching Health Technology Assessment (HTA) report
- Discrepancies between registered protocol and final publication in exercise interventions for chronic low back pain: a meta-research study
- Discrepancies in effect estimates of randomized clinical trials between low/middle-income and high-income countries: A meta-research study
- Do basket clinical trials in oncology increase health benefits for patients?
- Engaging volunteer translators: the Malaysian experience
- Environmental scanning to assess climate change readiness across Canadian health systems
- Equity Considerations in COVID-19 Vaccination Studies of Individuals With Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases
- Establishments of the Cochrane India Network: Sharing initial experiences
- Evaluation of the performance of five deduplication tools
- Evaluation of the search methods in systematic reviews related to climate change and adverse effects on health published in 2022-2023.
- Evidence summaries to champion evidence-based humanitarian action and building resilient health systems
- Evidence-Informed Policy-making (EIPM): developing an competency profile for Brazilian context
- Exploring incorporation of critical appraisal methods into rapid evidence reviews
- Exploring the characteristics, reporting, and methods of systematic reviews including time-to-event meta-analyses and outcome analyses: A meta-epidemiological review
- Facilitating global collaborations for pregnancy and pediatric biomarker research through a biobank database: the COPPER project
- Facilitating optimized decision-making using a knowledge user driven synthesis approach in a scoping review of social frailty interventions
- Helping the cause of trusted evidence: the work of Cochrane Germany, Austria and Switzerland
- How is equity addressed in Cochrane reviews of lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular health?
- How is quality analysis carried out for systematic reviews of nursing interventions?: umbrella review
- How much confidence to put on health systems reviews?: a comparative assessment using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS
- IMPACT OF A SINGLE REVIEWER ON CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT IN NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
- Impact of pilot/feasibility studies in meta-analyses of acupuncture: a meta-epidemiological study
- Improving alignment between research priorities and needs of people with multiple sclerosis: A worldwide, multi-stakeholder priority setting exercise
- Individual Participant Data (IPD) sharing plan statement: a Clinical Trial Registry perspective.
- Information and promotional strategies by pharmaceutical companies for clinicians
- Integrating the Cochrane Review Methodology for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis into an online learning course for medical students
- Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR-2 in a review of systematic reviews about interventions to prevent adverse events in the intensive care unit
- Keeping non-English Cochrane evidence dissemination products up to date
- Managing high volumes of evidence in systematic reviews: an umbrella review of approaches in Covid-19 vaccine reviews
- Meta-analyses of trials with low and high risk of bias in the randomisation domain may yield substantially different results
- Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for Parkinson’s disease: A cross-sectional study
- Methods for conducting a living evidence profile on mpox: an evidence map of the literature
- Multiple methods needed to ensure findings are relevant to stakeholders in a complex health systems review of lay health workers
- One in five recent systematic reviews in high-impact sports science journals assessed the certainty of evidence: a systematic meta-epidemiological review
- Outcome sets in surgical Cochrane Reviews: suggestions for next steps
- Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews synthesised as an evidence map
- Participation of stakeholders in the Development of a Clinical Guideline focused on decreasing the COVID-19 transmission risk in dentistry
- Practical implications of assessing the risk of bias in a Cochrane review with alternative tools
- Predatory Publishing in Evidence Synthesis is everyone’s problem
- Promoting the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews in dental practice through Live Webinars : Unveiling the Experiences
- Qualitative evidence synthesis by storyboarding and storytelling: Treatment adherence
- Rapid evidence identification in reviews of post-COVID syndrome: inclusion of preprint sources and timeliness of review completion
- Rate and time to the publication of Latin American systematic reviews indexed in PROSPERO: A meta-epidemiological study.
- Recommendations to keep a living systematic review alive during a pandemic
- Risk of Bias 2 tool: the user's point of view
- Scoping and question refinement for systematic reviews commissioned by policy customers
- Supporting evidence-based judicial decisions in Brazil: a case study
- Systematic review protocol registration: the perspectives of researchers, peer-reviewers, and journal editors through an online survey
- Systematic reviews in child and adolescent mental health and welfare: Systematic mapping
- The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: Analysis of 5,925 diagnostic test accuracy studies
- The economics of healthcare access in developing countries: A scoping review on the economic impact of healthcare access for urban populations
- The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings from Depression Randomized Controlled Trials
- The ISSG Search Filter Resource: improving the efficiency and quality of searches for studies for systematic reviews
- Title: Effective Knowledge Translation: Lessons from a Three-Day Interactive Cochrane Standard Author Training Webinar
- Training for awareness on using Cochrane Library in Ministry of Health, Malaysia
- Transfers between Cochrane review Groups to sharpen profile and facilitate the work of Cochrane authors
- Transfusion Evidence Round-ups’: an ISBT/SRI collaboration with a goal to share knowledge to improve transfusion practice worldwide.
- Transparent and traceable data science-based real-world evidence (DS-RWE) producing: framework and practice in traditional Chinese medicine
- Trials we cannot trust: investigating their impact on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines in spinal pain
- Trustworthy stopping criteria for reliable work savings from machine learning prioritised screening
- Use of GRADE in Dentistry Systematic Reviews: A Methodological Study
- What determinants of public health research activity contextualise embedded researcher roles? A qualitative investigation in English local government